2019년 들어서 지난해 SCM부분 Ranking이 궁금해서 찾아보다가 Gartner에서 지난해 5월 발표한 순위가 있어 공유합니다. 년 랭킹을 왜 5월에 발표했는지 모르겠지만, 25위 순위 내에 한국 업체가 삼성전자 하나 라니... 뭐 지표만으로 비교했다면 이정도는아니었겠지만 DSCM, 고객 경험, 순환SCM 3가지 측면을 고루 보았다고 하니 아직 갈 길이 멀어 보입니다. 우리 회사도 올해는 SCM 자동화 적용 부분에서라도 눈에 보이게 달라졌으면 하는 바램을 가져봅니다.
The Gartner
Supply Chain Top 25 for 2018
|
Rank
|
Company
|
Peer Opinion1
(184 voters) (25%) |
Gartner Opinion1
(42 voters) (25%) |
Three-
Year Weighted ROA2 (20%) |
Inventory Turns3
(10%) |
Three-
Year Weighted Revenue Growth4 (10%) |
CSR Component Score5
(10%) |
Composite Score6
|
|
1
|
Unilever
|
2,413
|
667
|
10.3%
|
7.5
|
2.6%
|
10.00
|
6.36
|
|
2
|
Inditex
|
1,254
|
345
|
16.5%
|
3.9
|
10.9%
|
10.00
|
4.85
|
|
3
|
Cisco Systems
|
785
|
541
|
7.9%
|
13.1
|
-0.4%
|
10.00
|
4.41
|
|
4
|
Colgate-Palmolive
|
898
|
324
|
17.6%
|
5.1
|
-2.2%
|
10.00
|
4.40
|
|
5
|
Intel
|
831
|
499
|
8.9%
|
3.6
|
4.8%
|
10.00
|
4.36
|
|
6
|
Nike
|
1,349
|
270
|
17.4%
|
3.8
|
6.8%
|
6.00
|
4.25
|
|
7
|
Nestlé
|
1,326
|
426
|
6.4%
|
4.8
|
-0.2%
|
10.00
|
4.21
|
|
8
|
PepsiCo
|
1,094
|
391
|
7.3%
|
8.8
|
-0,6%
|
10.00
|
3.99
|
|
9
|
H&M
|
760
|
193
|
18.1%
|
2.8
|
7.8%
|
10.00
|
3.96
|
|
10
|
Starbucks
|
1,040
|
186
|
20.4%
|
11.8
|
9.2%
|
4.00
|
3.85
|
|
11
|
3M
|
783
|
198
|
14.0%
|
4.1
|
1.4%
|
10.00
|
3.56
|
|
12
|
Schneider Electric
|
737
|
410
|
4.8%
|
5.2
|
-0.5%
|
10.00
|
3.55
|
|
13
|
Novo Nordisk
|
121
|
49
|
37.9%
|
1.2
|
5.3%
|
10.00
|
3.37
|
|
14
|
HP Inc.
|
390
|
354
|
7.3%
|
8.4
|
0.2%
|
10.00
|
3.30
|
|
15
|
L’Oréal
|
999
|
210
|
9.6%
|
2.9
|
4.6%
|
8.00
|
3.26
|
|
16
|
Diageo
|
651
|
227
|
9.2%
|
1.0
|
7.6%
|
10.00
|
3.25
|
|
17
|
Samsung Electronics
|
907
|
117
|
10.7%
|
14.6
|
9.8%
|
9.00
|
3.22
|
|
18
|
Johnson & Johnson
|
880
|
322
|
6.2%
|
2.7
|
2.8%
|
6.00
|
3.08
|
|
19
|
BASF
|
470
|
281
|
6.9%
|
4.4
|
-0.5%
|
10.00
|
3.02
|
|
20
|
Walmart
|
1,416
|
256
|
6.2%
|
8.3
|
1.6%
|
3.00
|
2.98
|
|
21
|
Kimberly-Clark
|
619
|
133
|
13.6%
|
6.7
|
-1.6%
|
8.00
|
2.96
|
|
22
|
The Coca Cola Co.
|
1,558
|
221
|
4.6%
|
4.8
|
-10.1%
|
4.00
|
2.87
|
|
23
|
Home Depot
|
431
|
78
|
18.6%
|
5.1
|
6.7%
|
5.00
|
2.81
|
|
24
|
Adidas
|
821
|
115
|
6.8%
|
2.9
|
13.5%
|
7.00
|
2.58
|
|
25
|
BMW
|
679
|
118
|
4.1%
|
4.2
|
6.0%
|
10.00
|
2.45
|
Notes:
1. Gartner Opinion and Peer Opinion: Based on each panel's forced-rank ordering against the definition of "DDVN orchestrator."
2. ROA: (2017 net income/2017 total assets)*50% + (2016 net income/2016 total assets)*30% + (2015 net income/2015 total assets)*20%.
3. Inventory Turns: 2017 cost of goods sold/2017 quarterly average inventory.
4. Revenue Growth: (Change in revenue 2017-2016)*50% + (change in revenue 2016-2015)*30% + (change in revenue 2015-2014)*20%.
5. CSR Component Score: Index of third-party corporate social responsibility measures of commitment, transparency and performance.
6. Composite Score: (Peer Opinion*25%) + (Gartner Research Opinion*25%) + (ROA*20%) + (Inventory Turns*10%) + (Revenue Growth*10%) + (CSR Component Score*10%).
2017 data used where available. Where unavailable, latest available full-year data used. All raw data normalized to a 10-point scale prior to composite calculation. "Ranks" for tied composite scores are determined using next decimal point comparison.
Source: Gartner (May 2018)
1. Gartner Opinion and Peer Opinion: Based on each panel's forced-rank ordering against the definition of "DDVN orchestrator."
2. ROA: (2017 net income/2017 total assets)*50% + (2016 net income/2016 total assets)*30% + (2015 net income/2015 total assets)*20%.
3. Inventory Turns: 2017 cost of goods sold/2017 quarterly average inventory.
4. Revenue Growth: (Change in revenue 2017-2016)*50% + (change in revenue 2016-2015)*30% + (change in revenue 2015-2014)*20%.
5. CSR Component Score: Index of third-party corporate social responsibility measures of commitment, transparency and performance.
6. Composite Score: (Peer Opinion*25%) + (Gartner Research Opinion*25%) + (ROA*20%) + (Inventory Turns*10%) + (Revenue Growth*10%) + (CSR Component Score*10%).
2017 data used where available. Where unavailable, latest available full-year data used. All raw data normalized to a 10-point scale prior to composite calculation. "Ranks" for tied composite scores are determined using next decimal point comparison.
Source: Gartner (May 2018)
기사원문
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기